Home » Latest News

Warner Music Regrets MySpace Music Deal

16 April 2009 One Comment
Share |


GD Star Rating
loading...

Myspace Music / Warner Music Group

April 16, 2009 |
 
One thing is for certain – the six month old MySpace Music project is throwing off a lot of cash to the labels. That’s because MySpace’s 75 million or so U.S. users are streaming literally billions of songs a month. And they have to pay for every song streamed.


 
Labels are known to give streaming rates for on demand music of around half a cent per song play, but they are negotiated on a deal by deal and label by label basis. Journalists have tried repeatedly to understand the rates that MySpace is paying since the volume means lots of dollars are at stake. MySpace has always guarded this information closely, since it’s a competitively valuable piece of information. But there’s another reason they may be so secretive – the deals they cut with the four big labels may all be very different. And the deal they cut with at least one label, Warner Music, may not have streaming rates at all.
 
Our sources say Warner has been complaining about the deal they did with MySpace. That deal has no per song streaming cost, but includes a revenue share on advertising displayed when the song is played. That revenue share hasn’t been what they thought it would be. And the staggering number of plays of songs from their catalog, combined with their newly acquired knowledge that their competitors are being paid per stream, has left them steaming mad.
 
Warner will get little sympathy from, well, anyone. But they’re telling people that they plan to make changes when their deal comes up for renewal, or pull their music from the service. But the fact that their revenue share is significantly less than they thought it would be means MySpace Music may not be monetizing as well as they had hoped. That means the whole ecosystem may be in danger. If MySpace is facing tens of millions of dollars in losses every year (or more) from royalty payments, it’s only a matter of time before they’ll give up.
 
Already the service does things to limit streaming and associated costs, like only playing four songs on a playlist before asking if you are still there. That leaves the door open for services that have different business models and allow for the user experience to come first.
 
MySpace Music refused to comment on this post.
 
Source

Warner Music Regrets MySpace Music Deal5.052
Related Posts with Thumbnails

One Comment »

  • SKORGE said:

    VERY INTERESTING STUFF FUNNY HOW SYSTEMS WORK OUT NOW I’M UNDERSTANDING A LIL BIT MORE WATS GOING ON ON THESE SITES

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word